Congressional
Republicans are reportedly considering new work requirements for
recipients of Medicaid and nutrition assistance as well as spending caps
for the programs as potential ways to counteract the massive cost of
their tax agenda, which would primarily benefit the rich and large corporations.
The Washington Postreported
Monday that Republicans, who are poised to take full control of the
federal government come January, "have begun preliminary discussions
about making significant changes to Medicaid, food stamps, and other
federal safety net programs to offset the enormous cost of extending" soon-to-expire elements of the regressive tax law that President-elect Donald Trump signed in year one of his first White House term.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated
earlier this year that an extension of the 2017 tax cuts would add $4.6
trillion to the U.S. deficit over the next decade. Republicans have made clear
that tax legislation is a top priority in the next Congress, and
they're preparing to use a fast-track procedure known as reconciliation
to ram a new round of tax cuts through.
According to the Post,
members of Trump's transition team have discussed with GOP lawmakers
and aides the possibility of adding punitive new work requirements and
spending caps to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP). Research and real-world experience
have consistently shown that work requirements do virtually nothing to
boost employment while making it harder for people in need to receive
aid.
"To pay for tax cuts for their billionaire donors, the
GOP wants to make food and healthcare unaffordable and inaccessible for
the most vulnerable people in our country," Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.) wrote in response to the Post's reporting. "Make no mistake on who they're serving."
"We
already knew the push to cut taxes for the wealthy next year was going
to be costly. Now we're learning that deep cuts to critical programs are
on the agenda to help pay for them."
Following an election in which grocery costs were a leading concern of many voters, the Post
reported that Republican lawmakers are "discussing stripping
presidential authority to recalculate benefits" for SNAP, the nation's highly effective hunger-reducing tool that helps millions afford food each year.
"Republicans
argue that if they eliminate that authority and hemmed in SNAP
benefits—which increase automatically with inflation—that should count
as reducing the deficit by tens of billions of dollars, according to
some estimates," the Post noted.
As for Medicaid, the
newspaper detailed preliminary GOP discussions to halt Biden
administration efforts to help people who lost coverage due to the post-pandemic purge, adding a work requirement similar to SNAP's, and conducting more frequent eligibility checks—which could result in more people losing access to the program.
House
Budget Committee Chair Rep. Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) openly made the
case last week for what he called a "responsible and reasonable work
requirement" for Medicaid, the Post observed.
Estimated
savings from such changes come nowhere near offsetting the huge
projected cost of extending Trump's 2017 tax cuts for individuals and
handing additional tax breaks to big corporations. On the campaign
trail, Trump proposed reducing the corporate tax rate from 21% to 15%, a
change that would give the 100 largest U.S. corporations a combined tax cut of $48 billion a year.
Trump's
tax agenda would also disproportionately benefit the wealthiest
individuals in the U.S. The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy
(ITEP) released an analysis
last month showing that the tax proposals Trump floated during his bid
for a second White House term would deliver annual tax cuts to the top
5% and tax hikes for the bottom 95%.
"We already knew the push to cut taxes for the wealthy next year was going to be costly," ITEP wrote on social media Monday. "Now we're learning that deep cuts to critical programs are on the agenda to help pay for them."